Verkäuferforen
Anmelden
Anmelden
imgAnmelden
user profile
Seller_FFIJSJwwYJs47

Return Fraud from Customers

Subject: How We Handled a Fraudulent Return — What Every Seller Should Know

We recently had a textbook case of return fraud where a buyer used Amazon's prepaid return label to send back a notebook and a My Little Pony sticker — instead of the 50 lb bag of fertilizer they originally purchased.

What We Did (and Recommend You Do Too):

✅ Document Everything Immediately

We opened the return, took high-res photos of the package, return label, and its contents (a joke, really), and compared it with the original outbound shipping record. This included weight discrepancies and batch/label mismatches.

✅ Contact the Buyer via Buyer-Seller Messaging

We informed them that the return was invalid as it did not match what was shipped. Amazon policy allows us to deny refunds for items that are materially different or not returned at all. We made it clear that no refund would be issued.

✅ Apply a 100% Restocking Fee (if You Process the Refund Yourself)

If you manually issue a refund in Seller Central, you can select the “Materially different item returned” option and apply up to a 100% restocking fee, per Amazon's own restocking policyrefundpolicies.

However, once you do this, you waive your right to a SAFE-T claim for reimbursement of return shipping costs.

✅ OR Let Amazon Auto-Refund and File a SAFE-T Claim

This is the tradeoff: If you let Amazon auto-refund the customer, you may lose the ability to apply a restocking fee, but you'll then be eligible to file a SAFE-T claim for reimbursement of the product value or label cost.

Amazon support confirmed:

“It is either you process the refund with the restocking fee, or Amazon will issue the refund without restocking fee and you request reimbursement of it through SAFE-T.”

✅ Report Buyer Abuse

You can (and should) report abusive customers via the Account Health page → Report Abuse → "An abuse issue not addressed by other topics"

Link: https://sellercentral.amazon.com/abuse-submission/index.html

What Amazon Won’t Tell You Clearly:

If you process a 100% restocking fee, you’re on the hook for the return label cost (in our case, $31.74 for a 50 lb return… that weighed <1 lb).

SAFE-T claims are not allowed if you issued the refund yourself.

Even in blatant fraud cases like this, Amazon's policies force sellers to pick their poison — either lose the shipping cost or the item value.

My Takeaway:

Amazon gives buyers the benefit of the doubt by default — sellers must back every move with documentation and policy knowledge. Return fraud happens more than you think. Stay strict, document well, and don’t hesitate to deny refunds when the evidence is clear.

157 Aufrufe
10 Antworten
Tags:Erstattungen, Kunde
20
Antworten
user profile
Seller_FFIJSJwwYJs47

Return Fraud from Customers

Subject: How We Handled a Fraudulent Return — What Every Seller Should Know

We recently had a textbook case of return fraud where a buyer used Amazon's prepaid return label to send back a notebook and a My Little Pony sticker — instead of the 50 lb bag of fertilizer they originally purchased.

What We Did (and Recommend You Do Too):

✅ Document Everything Immediately

We opened the return, took high-res photos of the package, return label, and its contents (a joke, really), and compared it with the original outbound shipping record. This included weight discrepancies and batch/label mismatches.

✅ Contact the Buyer via Buyer-Seller Messaging

We informed them that the return was invalid as it did not match what was shipped. Amazon policy allows us to deny refunds for items that are materially different or not returned at all. We made it clear that no refund would be issued.

✅ Apply a 100% Restocking Fee (if You Process the Refund Yourself)

If you manually issue a refund in Seller Central, you can select the “Materially different item returned” option and apply up to a 100% restocking fee, per Amazon's own restocking policyrefundpolicies.

However, once you do this, you waive your right to a SAFE-T claim for reimbursement of return shipping costs.

✅ OR Let Amazon Auto-Refund and File a SAFE-T Claim

This is the tradeoff: If you let Amazon auto-refund the customer, you may lose the ability to apply a restocking fee, but you'll then be eligible to file a SAFE-T claim for reimbursement of the product value or label cost.

Amazon support confirmed:

“It is either you process the refund with the restocking fee, or Amazon will issue the refund without restocking fee and you request reimbursement of it through SAFE-T.”

✅ Report Buyer Abuse

You can (and should) report abusive customers via the Account Health page → Report Abuse → "An abuse issue not addressed by other topics"

Link: https://sellercentral.amazon.com/abuse-submission/index.html

What Amazon Won’t Tell You Clearly:

If you process a 100% restocking fee, you’re on the hook for the return label cost (in our case, $31.74 for a 50 lb return… that weighed <1 lb).

SAFE-T claims are not allowed if you issued the refund yourself.

Even in blatant fraud cases like this, Amazon's policies force sellers to pick their poison — either lose the shipping cost or the item value.

My Takeaway:

Amazon gives buyers the benefit of the doubt by default — sellers must back every move with documentation and policy knowledge. Return fraud happens more than you think. Stay strict, document well, and don’t hesitate to deny refunds when the evidence is clear.

Tags:Erstattungen, Kunde
20
157 Aufrufe
10 Antworten
Antworten
10 Antworten
user profile
Seller_FFIJSJwwYJs47
In Antwort auf: Post von: Seller_FFIJSJwwYJs47

We’re currently planning to test a SAFE-T claim on another return that looks suspicious (potential fraud) to see exactly what Amazon will reimburse — and what documentation they actually consider sufficient.

We'll be documenting:

Return tracking + weight discrepancies

Item photos (what we shipped vs. what we got)

Communication logs with the buyer

Any signs of tampering or label swapping

Once we file the SAFE-T claim, I’ll report back here with the outcome. Hopefully it gives everyone clearer insight into when these claims are actually honored — and when Amazon leaves us holding the bag (literally and financially).

10
user profile
Xander_Amazon
In Antwort auf: Post von: Seller_FFIJSJwwYJs47

IrrigationMart - First off, sorry that it happened to you too. I've been working with the teams to stamp out the abusive accounts and because of reporting like yours in the forums, we have been successful in closing them. Thank you for sharing your experience and best practices with other sellers.

Respectfully,

Xander

20
user profile
Seller_smU4J8AZRxJNu
In Antwort auf: Post von: Seller_FFIJSJwwYJs47

This is organized retail crime stemming from the Walmart platform. Fraudulent Chinese storefronts are scraping the Amazon platform for all FBM listings. They do not have any inventory and list all of these top selling FBM listings at a lower price than on Amazon. The bargain hunter purchases on Walmart to save money; Chinese Walmart seller becomes fraudulent Amazon buyer and has the poor Amazon seller unknowingly ship this order directly to the Walmart customer. Walmart customer gets their order (albeit fulfilled by an Amazon seller). Walmart Chinese seller gets their pay and Walmart takes their commission. Then fraudulent Walmart seller/Amazon buyer claims "package not received" or does a straight chargeback. Triangulation fraud at its best folks. It has been happening since January of 2021 and there is an ongoing class-action lawsuit against Walmart--Google it and jump onboard. Make this stop.

00
Folgen Sie dieser Diskussion, um über neue Aktivitäten benachrichtigt zu werden
user profile
Seller_FFIJSJwwYJs47

Return Fraud from Customers

Subject: How We Handled a Fraudulent Return — What Every Seller Should Know

We recently had a textbook case of return fraud where a buyer used Amazon's prepaid return label to send back a notebook and a My Little Pony sticker — instead of the 50 lb bag of fertilizer they originally purchased.

What We Did (and Recommend You Do Too):

✅ Document Everything Immediately

We opened the return, took high-res photos of the package, return label, and its contents (a joke, really), and compared it with the original outbound shipping record. This included weight discrepancies and batch/label mismatches.

✅ Contact the Buyer via Buyer-Seller Messaging

We informed them that the return was invalid as it did not match what was shipped. Amazon policy allows us to deny refunds for items that are materially different or not returned at all. We made it clear that no refund would be issued.

✅ Apply a 100% Restocking Fee (if You Process the Refund Yourself)

If you manually issue a refund in Seller Central, you can select the “Materially different item returned” option and apply up to a 100% restocking fee, per Amazon's own restocking policyrefundpolicies.

However, once you do this, you waive your right to a SAFE-T claim for reimbursement of return shipping costs.

✅ OR Let Amazon Auto-Refund and File a SAFE-T Claim

This is the tradeoff: If you let Amazon auto-refund the customer, you may lose the ability to apply a restocking fee, but you'll then be eligible to file a SAFE-T claim for reimbursement of the product value or label cost.

Amazon support confirmed:

“It is either you process the refund with the restocking fee, or Amazon will issue the refund without restocking fee and you request reimbursement of it through SAFE-T.”

✅ Report Buyer Abuse

You can (and should) report abusive customers via the Account Health page → Report Abuse → "An abuse issue not addressed by other topics"

Link: https://sellercentral.amazon.com/abuse-submission/index.html

What Amazon Won’t Tell You Clearly:

If you process a 100% restocking fee, you’re on the hook for the return label cost (in our case, $31.74 for a 50 lb return… that weighed <1 lb).

SAFE-T claims are not allowed if you issued the refund yourself.

Even in blatant fraud cases like this, Amazon's policies force sellers to pick their poison — either lose the shipping cost or the item value.

My Takeaway:

Amazon gives buyers the benefit of the doubt by default — sellers must back every move with documentation and policy knowledge. Return fraud happens more than you think. Stay strict, document well, and don’t hesitate to deny refunds when the evidence is clear.

157 Aufrufe
10 Antworten
Tags:Erstattungen, Kunde
20
Antworten
user profile
Seller_FFIJSJwwYJs47

Return Fraud from Customers

Subject: How We Handled a Fraudulent Return — What Every Seller Should Know

We recently had a textbook case of return fraud where a buyer used Amazon's prepaid return label to send back a notebook and a My Little Pony sticker — instead of the 50 lb bag of fertilizer they originally purchased.

What We Did (and Recommend You Do Too):

✅ Document Everything Immediately

We opened the return, took high-res photos of the package, return label, and its contents (a joke, really), and compared it with the original outbound shipping record. This included weight discrepancies and batch/label mismatches.

✅ Contact the Buyer via Buyer-Seller Messaging

We informed them that the return was invalid as it did not match what was shipped. Amazon policy allows us to deny refunds for items that are materially different or not returned at all. We made it clear that no refund would be issued.

✅ Apply a 100% Restocking Fee (if You Process the Refund Yourself)

If you manually issue a refund in Seller Central, you can select the “Materially different item returned” option and apply up to a 100% restocking fee, per Amazon's own restocking policyrefundpolicies.

However, once you do this, you waive your right to a SAFE-T claim for reimbursement of return shipping costs.

✅ OR Let Amazon Auto-Refund and File a SAFE-T Claim

This is the tradeoff: If you let Amazon auto-refund the customer, you may lose the ability to apply a restocking fee, but you'll then be eligible to file a SAFE-T claim for reimbursement of the product value or label cost.

Amazon support confirmed:

“It is either you process the refund with the restocking fee, or Amazon will issue the refund without restocking fee and you request reimbursement of it through SAFE-T.”

✅ Report Buyer Abuse

You can (and should) report abusive customers via the Account Health page → Report Abuse → "An abuse issue not addressed by other topics"

Link: https://sellercentral.amazon.com/abuse-submission/index.html

What Amazon Won’t Tell You Clearly:

If you process a 100% restocking fee, you’re on the hook for the return label cost (in our case, $31.74 for a 50 lb return… that weighed <1 lb).

SAFE-T claims are not allowed if you issued the refund yourself.

Even in blatant fraud cases like this, Amazon's policies force sellers to pick their poison — either lose the shipping cost or the item value.

My Takeaway:

Amazon gives buyers the benefit of the doubt by default — sellers must back every move with documentation and policy knowledge. Return fraud happens more than you think. Stay strict, document well, and don’t hesitate to deny refunds when the evidence is clear.

Tags:Erstattungen, Kunde
20
157 Aufrufe
10 Antworten
Antworten
user profile

Return Fraud from Customers

von Seller_FFIJSJwwYJs47

Subject: How We Handled a Fraudulent Return — What Every Seller Should Know

We recently had a textbook case of return fraud where a buyer used Amazon's prepaid return label to send back a notebook and a My Little Pony sticker — instead of the 50 lb bag of fertilizer they originally purchased.

What We Did (and Recommend You Do Too):

✅ Document Everything Immediately

We opened the return, took high-res photos of the package, return label, and its contents (a joke, really), and compared it with the original outbound shipping record. This included weight discrepancies and batch/label mismatches.

✅ Contact the Buyer via Buyer-Seller Messaging

We informed them that the return was invalid as it did not match what was shipped. Amazon policy allows us to deny refunds for items that are materially different or not returned at all. We made it clear that no refund would be issued.

✅ Apply a 100% Restocking Fee (if You Process the Refund Yourself)

If you manually issue a refund in Seller Central, you can select the “Materially different item returned” option and apply up to a 100% restocking fee, per Amazon's own restocking policyrefundpolicies.

However, once you do this, you waive your right to a SAFE-T claim for reimbursement of return shipping costs.

✅ OR Let Amazon Auto-Refund and File a SAFE-T Claim

This is the tradeoff: If you let Amazon auto-refund the customer, you may lose the ability to apply a restocking fee, but you'll then be eligible to file a SAFE-T claim for reimbursement of the product value or label cost.

Amazon support confirmed:

“It is either you process the refund with the restocking fee, or Amazon will issue the refund without restocking fee and you request reimbursement of it through SAFE-T.”

✅ Report Buyer Abuse

You can (and should) report abusive customers via the Account Health page → Report Abuse → "An abuse issue not addressed by other topics"

Link: https://sellercentral.amazon.com/abuse-submission/index.html

What Amazon Won’t Tell You Clearly:

If you process a 100% restocking fee, you’re on the hook for the return label cost (in our case, $31.74 for a 50 lb return… that weighed <1 lb).

SAFE-T claims are not allowed if you issued the refund yourself.

Even in blatant fraud cases like this, Amazon's policies force sellers to pick their poison — either lose the shipping cost or the item value.

My Takeaway:

Amazon gives buyers the benefit of the doubt by default — sellers must back every move with documentation and policy knowledge. Return fraud happens more than you think. Stay strict, document well, and don’t hesitate to deny refunds when the evidence is clear.

Tags:Erstattungen, Kunde
20
157 Aufrufe
10 Antworten
Antworten
10 Antworten
10 Antworten
Schnellfilter
Sortieren nach
user profile
Seller_FFIJSJwwYJs47
In Antwort auf: Post von: Seller_FFIJSJwwYJs47

We’re currently planning to test a SAFE-T claim on another return that looks suspicious (potential fraud) to see exactly what Amazon will reimburse — and what documentation they actually consider sufficient.

We'll be documenting:

Return tracking + weight discrepancies

Item photos (what we shipped vs. what we got)

Communication logs with the buyer

Any signs of tampering or label swapping

Once we file the SAFE-T claim, I’ll report back here with the outcome. Hopefully it gives everyone clearer insight into when these claims are actually honored — and when Amazon leaves us holding the bag (literally and financially).

10
user profile
Xander_Amazon
In Antwort auf: Post von: Seller_FFIJSJwwYJs47

IrrigationMart - First off, sorry that it happened to you too. I've been working with the teams to stamp out the abusive accounts and because of reporting like yours in the forums, we have been successful in closing them. Thank you for sharing your experience and best practices with other sellers.

Respectfully,

Xander

20
user profile
Seller_smU4J8AZRxJNu
In Antwort auf: Post von: Seller_FFIJSJwwYJs47

This is organized retail crime stemming from the Walmart platform. Fraudulent Chinese storefronts are scraping the Amazon platform for all FBM listings. They do not have any inventory and list all of these top selling FBM listings at a lower price than on Amazon. The bargain hunter purchases on Walmart to save money; Chinese Walmart seller becomes fraudulent Amazon buyer and has the poor Amazon seller unknowingly ship this order directly to the Walmart customer. Walmart customer gets their order (albeit fulfilled by an Amazon seller). Walmart Chinese seller gets their pay and Walmart takes their commission. Then fraudulent Walmart seller/Amazon buyer claims "package not received" or does a straight chargeback. Triangulation fraud at its best folks. It has been happening since January of 2021 and there is an ongoing class-action lawsuit against Walmart--Google it and jump onboard. Make this stop.

00
Folgen Sie dieser Diskussion, um über neue Aktivitäten benachrichtigt zu werden
user profile
Seller_FFIJSJwwYJs47
In Antwort auf: Post von: Seller_FFIJSJwwYJs47

We’re currently planning to test a SAFE-T claim on another return that looks suspicious (potential fraud) to see exactly what Amazon will reimburse — and what documentation they actually consider sufficient.

We'll be documenting:

Return tracking + weight discrepancies

Item photos (what we shipped vs. what we got)

Communication logs with the buyer

Any signs of tampering or label swapping

Once we file the SAFE-T claim, I’ll report back here with the outcome. Hopefully it gives everyone clearer insight into when these claims are actually honored — and when Amazon leaves us holding the bag (literally and financially).

10
user profile
Seller_FFIJSJwwYJs47
In Antwort auf: Post von: Seller_FFIJSJwwYJs47

We’re currently planning to test a SAFE-T claim on another return that looks suspicious (potential fraud) to see exactly what Amazon will reimburse — and what documentation they actually consider sufficient.

We'll be documenting:

Return tracking + weight discrepancies

Item photos (what we shipped vs. what we got)

Communication logs with the buyer

Any signs of tampering or label swapping

Once we file the SAFE-T claim, I’ll report back here with the outcome. Hopefully it gives everyone clearer insight into when these claims are actually honored — and when Amazon leaves us holding the bag (literally and financially).

10
Antworten
user profile
Xander_Amazon
In Antwort auf: Post von: Seller_FFIJSJwwYJs47

IrrigationMart - First off, sorry that it happened to you too. I've been working with the teams to stamp out the abusive accounts and because of reporting like yours in the forums, we have been successful in closing them. Thank you for sharing your experience and best practices with other sellers.

Respectfully,

Xander

20
user profile
Xander_Amazon
In Antwort auf: Post von: Seller_FFIJSJwwYJs47

IrrigationMart - First off, sorry that it happened to you too. I've been working with the teams to stamp out the abusive accounts and because of reporting like yours in the forums, we have been successful in closing them. Thank you for sharing your experience and best practices with other sellers.

Respectfully,

Xander

20
Antworten
user profile
Seller_smU4J8AZRxJNu
In Antwort auf: Post von: Seller_FFIJSJwwYJs47

This is organized retail crime stemming from the Walmart platform. Fraudulent Chinese storefronts are scraping the Amazon platform for all FBM listings. They do not have any inventory and list all of these top selling FBM listings at a lower price than on Amazon. The bargain hunter purchases on Walmart to save money; Chinese Walmart seller becomes fraudulent Amazon buyer and has the poor Amazon seller unknowingly ship this order directly to the Walmart customer. Walmart customer gets their order (albeit fulfilled by an Amazon seller). Walmart Chinese seller gets their pay and Walmart takes their commission. Then fraudulent Walmart seller/Amazon buyer claims "package not received" or does a straight chargeback. Triangulation fraud at its best folks. It has been happening since January of 2021 and there is an ongoing class-action lawsuit against Walmart--Google it and jump onboard. Make this stop.

00
user profile
Seller_smU4J8AZRxJNu
In Antwort auf: Post von: Seller_FFIJSJwwYJs47

This is organized retail crime stemming from the Walmart platform. Fraudulent Chinese storefronts are scraping the Amazon platform for all FBM listings. They do not have any inventory and list all of these top selling FBM listings at a lower price than on Amazon. The bargain hunter purchases on Walmart to save money; Chinese Walmart seller becomes fraudulent Amazon buyer and has the poor Amazon seller unknowingly ship this order directly to the Walmart customer. Walmart customer gets their order (albeit fulfilled by an Amazon seller). Walmart Chinese seller gets their pay and Walmart takes their commission. Then fraudulent Walmart seller/Amazon buyer claims "package not received" or does a straight chargeback. Triangulation fraud at its best folks. It has been happening since January of 2021 and there is an ongoing class-action lawsuit against Walmart--Google it and jump onboard. Make this stop.

00
Antworten
Folgen Sie dieser Diskussion, um über neue Aktivitäten benachrichtigt zu werden